![]() ![]() This is not the best printer in the market. The Cetus 3D Printer has got the best-built quality when comparing with the printers available in the market for just $400. The build quality is a measurement that has to be considered as a relative thing. This 3D printer has long durability with the performance as well as speed. So, there is nothing to worry about the hardware. BuildĪll the parts of The Cetus 3D Printer are from well-recognized manufacturers. Though The Cetus 3D Printer is built similar to the other 3D printers in the market, it is a simply built design among them all. You don’t have to spend too much time to understand the device when compared with the other devices. But, this model doesn’t require a lot of skills or knowledge about the 3D printer as it has got a user-friendly interface as well as hardware. There are lots of features available in a 3D printer and all those things together make a complicated device that requires lots of attention to work with. It is said not by just customers, but many users that The Cetus 3D Printer is a great one to use with the ease of use. Here are some features as well as review points regarding The Cetus 3D Printer. Here are some features as well as review points regarding The Cetus 3D Printer.But, if you consider all these factors at once, The Cetus 3D Printer will be a perfect design for you to buy for a price of around $400. There are lots of printers in the world matching these requirements. If you have a look at the additional features expect from a printer, print area, high hardware compatibility, less maintenance cost, print speed, and user-friendly interface, you will understand that this printer is way beyond those requirements. But, it can be bought for a price of $400 from the market. The Cetus 3D Printer is not the cheapest product in the market. This printer is not only capable of powering your expectations but also allowing you to ensure you reach your dreams whatever the measures they have. If you have a look at the reviews of people who have purchased this printer, you will be able to understand the good attitude people bear regarding the printer. Since the software only knows about the steps and thinks they correspond one-to-one to a distance change, it tells me that the z-offset is larger that it actually is.The Cetus 3D Printer has been the expectation of lots of people for their projects since a long time ago. When the motor has to work against the spring to push the nozzle down, the slight flexibility in the belt means that it has to do more steps to get to the build plate. This is what happened with the calibration. This is not a problem if the load on the belt is constant, but when the load changes, the height will not follow the steps of the motor one-to-one any more. At least the z-axis moves a little bit up and down when pushing or pulling on it. The z-axis belt seems to be slightly flexible. And it is easy to see why that is happening. ![]() When calibrating the nozzle height with the spring installed, I got considerably larger values for the z-offset than without it. This is when I noticed that the spring approach might not work after all. Fortunately it stuck on the left side and the print was finished and produced a usable (albeit lightly skewed) spring. This reduced the adhesion and the raft peeled off on the right side of the print. The z-axis could not reach the position it wanted to and the first layer was extruded at a too high position. I forgot to remove nr 3 before starting the print of nr 4. ![]() While printing nr 4, it also became obvious why this parameter had to be tuned: It took me until iteration 4 to get the height just about right. The nozzle could no longer reach the build plate. The first iteration already seemed promising, but it was too high. So I designed a plastic spring in Fusion 360 and got printing: The spring would probably not be able to stop the thing completely before the nozzle touches the build plate if the z-axis fell from the top position, but a decelerated impact would be better than a full speed one. In normal operation, the z-axis would push the spring down to build the first centimetre of the prints. My first idea was to print some sort of spring mechanism that would catch the y-axis when it comes crashing down. Also it is much more fun to design your own solution. I would like to avoid any manual locking or unlocking. When the z-axis is locked, it needs to be released manually when one wants to start a new print. This is done either manually or when the z-axis reaches a certain height. There are already a few designs out there that deal with this problem, but they usually just lock the z-axis completely. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |